Abortion The abortion debate most commonly relates to the "induced abortion" of an embryo or fetus at some point in a pregnancy, which is also how the term is used in a legal sense.
Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet Book he authored in advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population Forced abortions.
A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens. The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely Partial birth abortion essay opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? In a book Holdren co-authored inthe man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that: That must be an exaggeration or a hoax.
No one in their right mind would say such things. Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscienceco-authored in by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.
The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed. But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion.
In the modern era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to back up the claims. Well, this report contains that evidence.
Of course, Holdren wrote these things in the framework of a book he co-authored about what he imagined at the time late s was an apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: He felt extreme measures would be required to combat an extreme problem.
Whether or not you think this provides him a valid "excuse" for having descended into a totalitarian fantasy is up to you: Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible.
On the left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage, with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short analysis by me. Following these short quotes, I take a "step back" and provide the full extended passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to provide the full context.
And at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans and photos of the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to forestall any claims that the quotes were taken "out of context.
And prepare to be shocked. Compulsory abortions would be legal Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren "hides behind the passive voice" in this passage, by saying "it has been concluded.
Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone.
If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it.
Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.
Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis.
Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily.
This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name.
I think that abortion should not be illegal.
But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice -- to force women to have abortions. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself regardless of my views may find particularly immoral or traumatic.
Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems.
It is worth noting that all of the following predictions have failed. We expect that all of the doomsday predictions about our future will also fail. Disclaimer: We offer no guarantees that the prophets listed below actually made these predictions. Ten Legal Reasons to Reject Roe By Susan E. Wills, Esq. Respect Life Program Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court rarely attract much public interest. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: Putting sterilants in the water supply?Get an answer for 'What is a good thesis statement for abortion?
I just need a complex sentence to get me started. Although I have thought of some already, they are not very good or helpful.
Any. Abortion in the United States has been, and remains, a controversial issue in United States culture and politics.
Various anti-abortion laws have been in force in each state since at least Before the U.S. Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade decriminalised abortion nationwide in , abortion was already legal in several states, but the . Bouvier's Law Dictionary Edition.
A. A, the first letter of the English and most other alphabets, is frequently used as an abbreviation, (q. v.) and also in the marks of schedules or papers, as schedule A, B, C, ®ardbouddhiste.com the Romans this letter was used in criminal trials.
The judges were furnished with small tables covered with wax, and each one inscribed on it the initial letter of his. It is worth noting that all of the following predictions have failed. We expect that all of the doomsday predictions about our future will also fail.
Disclaimer: We offer no guarantees that the prophets listed below actually made these predictions. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
Partial Birth Abortion and Federalism With the Supreme Court decision on the right of a woman to abortion in , controversy still looms heavy in the opinions of the people of America.
The State of Texas was the subject of challenge by a single pregnant .