Negotiation styles

Although the principles are listed separately, it is possible to use one followed by another or to use two or more at the same time. Regard this advice as a tool box - use whatever seems appropriate to your situation and, if one technique does not work, try another. Cuddles are better than conflict Be calm.

Negotiation styles

Negotiations occur constantly on micro and macro scales, both in the office and in everyday life. As Negotiation styles counsel, you are sure to encounter numerous types of negotiations Negotiation styles part of your daily tasks, such as salary negotiations, contract negotiations with outside counsel, settlement negotiations during litigation, union negotiations, purchase order negotiations, and more.

This QuickCounsel provides a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of different types of negotiating formats, negotiating styles and preparation strategies.

Negotiation styles

Negotiation Formats While countless types of negotiations exist, running the gamut from negotiating with your spouse over which tv show to watch to settling a civil suit, there are only two main formats in which these negotiations take place.

Positional bargainingalso known as distributive negotiation, involves arguing based on a position. Each side takes an extreme position based on its wants, needs, and limitations. These positions are almost always on opposite ends of the spectrum. The parties then treat the negotiation as a zero-sum game in which only one party can "win" the negotiation.

By starting with an extreme initial position, the parties are then forced to make concessions to reach agreement. The smaller the concessions made, the more victorious one party feels. However, by starting with extreme positions and making only small concessions, the parties find that the negotiations become tense and drag on.

A failed negotiation results when a stalemate is reached, and no final agreement is made. Positional bargaining is best characterized by a pie analogy - each party is competing for the biggest slice of the pie. The negotiating room grows hostile, and communications may involve threats and lack transparency.


A lack of trust ensues, and the future of the relationship may seem precarious. As the negotiation continues, parties grow even more entrenched in their positions, refusing to change their minds.

Parties strongly commit themselves to one position and one position only and focus only on their own goals. Despite its flaws, there is a time and place for positional bargaining. It works best when haggling on price, compromising on a position with another party that has conflicting underlying interests, or acting in a situation of immediate crisis.

Principled negotiationalso known as integrative negotiation, is another negotiation format in which parties work together to forge a value-creating agreement that leaves both parties happy with the outcome and with the status of the relationship.

Principled negotiation creates a collaborative environment in which parties establish shared interests and work together to build mutually beneficial solutions. Parties are able to understand each other and trust each other while also being creative in solving the shared problem.

Rather than thinking in terms of positions, the parties think in terms of interests and problems. Rather than a zero-sum game, principled negotiation leaves both parties no worse off than when they started the negotiation.

Principled negotiation can also be characterized by a pie analogy - each party collaborates with the other to try to create a bigger, mutually beneficial pie in which to share.

There are five main negotiation styles. Each negotiation style deals with conflict differently. These five styles are competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. Each style has its advantages and disadvantagesand it is crucial to be tactical in which style you choose, considering such factors as the style of the other negotiator and the type of negotiation.

The competing style is the most adversarial style. Negotiators who gravitate to this style see negotiations as competitions that have winners and losers.

The other negotiation styles see competing negotiators as aggressive and strategic. The competing style works best when you need a fast negotiation or when there aren't many variables at play, such as simply negotiating over the price of a product.

However, the competing style does not work well when used against another using the competing style; often, deadlock occurs, and relationships become frayed or even hostile. The accommodative style is a submissive style, the yin to the competing style's yang.

Accommodators are ready and willing to give information and to make concessions.

Negotiation styles

Accommodators often let the other side of the table win on issues. This can be dangerous when negotiating against a competing style. However, accommodators put relationship as a top priority, and this style can be very successful in negotiations in which mending or maintaining relationships is critical.Coach, negotiation expert, and author Lisa Gates demonstrates the skills empowered communicators use to achieve mutual benefit at the negotiation table. is much more than a Curriculum Vitae guide. Here you can find information for your whole job search: cover letter tips, interview techniques, job search strategies, career planning, as well as free resume/CV examples, templates and advice.

Integrative negotiation is also called interest-based, merit-based, or principled negotiation. It is a set of techniques that attempts to improve the quality and likelihood of negotiated agreement by taking advantage of the fact that different parties often value various outcomes differently.

4 Responses to “Identify Your Negotiation Style: Advanced Negotiation Strategies and Concepts” Dan January 16, One big disadvantage of some one who .

Effective Negotiation Strategies and Preparation

Negotiation styles fall into five categories, dependent on how assertive and cooperative they are. Each style will favor a certain approach to negotiations, and has strategic strengths and weaknesses. • Negotiating teams frequently sabotage their own efforts: Even though everyone is technically on the same side, each member has different priorities and .

Negotiation Articles | Negotiation Experts